Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265

Garmin Forerunner 265 wins 5 of the 7 categories we compared, against 1 for Garmin Forerunner 165 (1 tied) — including battery life (13 days vs 11 days).

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: our verdict

Forerunner 165 makes more sense for runners who want a lighter, thinner watch that feels less bulky all day and costs less to get into. You will be charging it more often.

Step up to the Forerunner 265 if you want longer battery life, a larger and sharper display, dual-band GPS, music storage, and more advanced training metrics. You pay $200 more and give up a lighter, slimmer build.

Summarised from our video comparison of these two wearables.

Watch the video comparison

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Battery & Charging

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Battery life 11 days 13 days
GPS battery life 19 hours 20 hours
Charging time 120 min 50 min
Charging Garmin proprietary charging cable Garmin proprietary charging cable

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Display

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Screen size 1.2 in 1.3 in
Display type AMOLED touchscreen AMOLED touchscreen
Resolution 390 x 390 416 x 416
Screen protection Chemically strengthened glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Health Sensors

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Heart rate Yes Yes
ECG No No
Blood oxygen (SpO2) Yes Yes
Heart rate variability Yes Yes
Skin temperature No No
Blood pressure alerts No No
Irregular rhythm alerts No No
Breathing rate Yes Yes
Sleep tracking Yes Yes
Stress tracking Yes Yes

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: GPS & Navigation

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Built-in GPS Yes Yes
Dual-band GPS No Yes
Satellite systems 3 3
Offline maps No No
Barometer Yes Yes
Compass Yes Yes

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Smart Features

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Contactless payments Yes Yes
Music storage No Yes
Calls from the wrist No No
Cellular (LTE) No No
Wi-Fi No Yes
Notifications Yes Yes
Fall detection Yes Yes
Emergency SOS Yes Yes
Software Garmin proprietary Garmin proprietary
Works with Android & iOS Android & iOS
Voice assistant No No

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Design & Durability

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Weight 39 g 47 g
Thickness 11.6 mm 12.9 mm
Water resistance 50 m 50 m
Military-grade toughness No No
Case size 43 mm 46.1 mm
Material Plastic Plastic

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265: Price & Colors

Spec Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 165 Garmin Forerunner 265 Garmin Forerunner 265
Colors Mist Grey/Whitestone, Black/Slate Grey Black/Powder Grey, Whitestone, Aqua/Black
Release year 2024 2023

Where each one wins

Garmin Forerunner 165

  • Weight: 39 g (vs 47 g)
  • Thickness: 11.6 mm (vs 12.9 mm)

Garmin Forerunner 265

  • Battery life: 13 days (vs 11 days)
  • GPS battery life: 20 hours (vs 19 hours)
  • Charging time: 50 min (vs 120 min)
  • Screen size: 1.3 in (vs 1.2 in)
  • Dual-band GPS
  • Music storage
  • Wi-Fi

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, the Garmin Forerunner 165 or the Garmin Forerunner 265?

Garmin Forerunner 265 wins 5 of the 7 categories we compared, against 1 for Garmin Forerunner 165 (1 tied) — including battery life (13 days vs 11 days).

Which is cheaper, the Garmin Forerunner 165 or the Garmin Forerunner 265?

The Garmin Forerunner 165 costs around $249, $200 less than the Garmin Forerunner 265 at around $449.

What are the main differences between the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Garmin Forerunner 265?

The biggest gaps are in battery life (13 days on the Garmin Forerunner 265 vs 11 days); weight (39 g on the Garmin Forerunner 165 vs 47 g); GPS battery life (20 hours on the Garmin Forerunner 265 vs 19 hours).